January 2009
Whereas I admit that I have not updated this website very frequently, I have been networking with possibly interested parties who would like to help evaluate the feasibility Macomb, IL as a model sustainable city. We are putting together a conference call for sometime in January. Details will be forthcoming. For another announcement location at the Macomb Journal message board, click here and select the thread entitled "Sustainable City Conference Call".
Update:
I'll take it as a sign of progress that interested or curious parties desire to have a meeting with high quality content and communication. This would require more preparation than would be possible by January and more preparation than would a meet and greet type of round table discussion. So, there will be no meeting here in January. We may yet see what develops in the future.
Here is a preliminary schematic of the overall system that the interested parties are hoping to discuss. We're still working on finalizing the details of the netmeeting. It does look better to have a netmeeting than a conference call.
Welcome to Model Sustainable Cities. I hope that this site will become a meeting point, a networking hub for people interested in developing model sustainable cities. Topics will include but not be limited to sustainability, city planning, the hydrogen economy, and renewable resources such as wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal energies.
Below is a map showing the location of Macomb, IL. You may zoom using the + and - signs in the upper left corner. Below that is the text of a letter to the editor that I published in Macomb, Illinois's local newspapers: the Macomb Eagle and the Macomb Journal. It describes characteristics of Macomb that I believe make it an ideal place to develop a model hydrogen economy, a model sustainable city.
November 2007
To the Editor:
A few months ago, William Bailey, chairman of the department of agriculture at Western, wrote in a local column about Beardstown’s economic potential. I believe that a similar line of reasoning could display more of Macomb’s economic potential. The following quote can be found online at the Illinois Farm Bureau’s FarmWeek archive of “Perspective” columns. See July 25, 2007 “Perspective -- Ports of Beardstown, Los Angeles, Singapore share traits”
It is a bit more of a stretch to think of Beardstown as an international port through which containers of agricultural products could move to anyplace in the world.
But that is certainly possible and is well within the grasp of a number of businesses who are attempting to make Beardstown into an international port.
Now, I propose that Macomb would be an ideal location to develop a model sustainable city. Perhaps this is also a stretch. But let me build the beginnings of my case.
What does such a city look like? Let me briefly describe a few techniques that could be integrated into a sustainable city. Buildings could be built or retrofitted to become hyper-efficient, using energy from their surroundings for heating and cooling and sometimes even lighting and electricity. Buildings so designed often return energy to the electrical grid. Hydrogen could serve as the premier energy carrier. It could be used as a fuel for transportation in fuel cells or hydrogen internal combustion engines (H2ICE’s). Hydrogen might also heat homes by combustion or by fuel cells producing electricity for heating and other household applications. The hydrogen will be produced from renewable resources such as biomass conversion or from the electrolysis of water using wind or solar energy. Before all our fossil fuels are consumed, they can be reformed to produce hydrogen as a steppingstone toward fully renewable sources of hydrogen.
Why would Macomb be a good place to accelerate our transition? First, other cities are already pursuing the goal of becoming sustainable. For instance, Columbia, SC is seeking to become “Hydrogen City.” A smaller city of 14,000 in Lolland, Denmark is also hoping to become the world’s first hydrogen city, H2PIA. So, there is precedent for bodies politic on the municipal level to spearhead this kind of economic development. Second, leaders in the state of Illinois are already pursuing other projects in sustainability. Most of us are keenly aware of the importance of Illinois ethanol as a step toward sustainability. Similarly as in other states, northern Illinois is developing a hydrogen highway. This is in accord with the vision for the eventual national transition to a hydrogen-based economy. Third, any time one wants to build a large, complex machine, one starts by building a smaller model, a prototype. If cities are large, complex machines, smaller cities could be developed that model the vision for the future development of the larger cities.
Are there any cities in Illinois aiming to become fully sustainable? Are there any locations in Illinois where there could be built a locally functioning, model hydrogen economy? Let me be specific about Macomb’s characteristics that I believe make it an ideal place to build one such model economy. Macomb is both large enough and small enough to qualify as a model city. Macomb can be described as “micropolitan.” It has mechanics, movement patterns, and other qualities similar to a metropolitan area, except on a smaller scale. For instance, the satellite towns in McDonough County are to Macomb as Chicago’s suburbs are to the larger Chicago. Next, Macomb is a city of learning. WIU is a primary economic engine. Much of Macomb’s core population is in the education industry. An excellent teaching opportunity exists for a community to develop itself as a model for sustainability. It would be like a giant field exercise or scientific experiment in research and development. Third, Macomb’s rural setting with low population density is an advantage. Our agribusiness people understand the cyclic nature of agricultural production patterns. These patterns are very similar to sustainable energy production and consumption patterns. Also, our low population density will make it easier for the older technologies to be upgraded or replaced by the newer technologies. Think of it like the difference between the traffic jams around construction in metropolitan areas versus the only slightly more congested traffic around construction in smaller cities and towns. Fourth, the use of economic cooperatives such as the electric and telephone cooperatives show that our people have a history of working together to bring to us goods and services difficult to procure by other methods. This is a kind of cooperation similar to the lifestyles that will eventually be necessary for life among the future’s sustainable energy infrastructure. Finally, we are already connected to or near enough to companies who would likely be interested in cooperating in this project. For instance, large equipment manufacturers John Deere and Caterpillar are each only two hours away. These are only a couple possibilities of which I have personal knowledge.
How do we get started? I would suggest an expanded feasibility study. I have tried to show above some of the factors that make the project feasible. But there are professionals, such as Teska Associates, who could work together to develop a more comprehensive plan. Consider Macomb’s Comprehensive Plan, p. 65, Figure D – Action Plan Table, Line Four: “Action Step: Promote the use of green technology and clean energy. Purpose: To become a sustainable City and to reduce green-house gas emissions.” http://www.teskaassociates.com/client/Macomb/Downloads/Implementation%20Plan.pdf
With a little vision, we could tell a grand story, invite the investment of cutting edge technology, and develop an already great city into a model city. People will flock to Macomb to see how we did it. Students will live the future at WIU. And people will learn from our model in order to improve their own cities.
Sincerely,
Daniel Miller
For one lively discussion of the above opinion piece click here.
Below is a letter to the editor I wrote in August 2005. It describes my first awareness of the magnitude of the challenge facing us because of Peak Oil.
August 2005
To the Editor:
I am concerned about the future of modern civilization. Anyone who loves their children, family and friends, likes to eat, expects to live to a ripe old age in this coming century, and who may be complaining about the high gas prices may want to heavily weigh the issues I have personally only recently realized.
As a nation and as a world, we are and will be facing a phenomenon known as Peak Oil. The earth only had a certain amount of fossil fuels; mainly oil, natural gas, and coal. Today, the world, especially the United States, you and I, continue to consume these fuels at an alarming rate. This is not just an environmentalist’s concern. Our modern civilization has been built using materials and energy derived from fossil fuels BY technologies that themselves use these same fossil materials and energies. Even the food on our tables only arrives there because of oil: chemical fertilizers, shipping, refrigeration, and other oil-powered and constructed infrastructure. Our water supply is also similarly powered by oil. A human can only live about a week without water and only about 3 or so weeks without food. And toward the end of these weeks, it is not a very comfortable existence.
We are much more dependent on oil than is safe for our national and personal existence. Whereas a total analysis cannot fit in a letter to the editor, significant economic analysts are scared that modern, western financial and economic collapse may be imminent. What does that mean for you and me? Well, if the system that brings our food to us collapses, there is only so much food in the grocery stores and local supplies to go around. Hungry people may become violent. Even if governmental bodies can keep enough of the infrastructure moving so as to deliver the food, there will at least be a serious, immediate decrease in our quality of life.
I hope we have a few cooperative realists among us. I hope our society can find common ground in taking action in resolving the tough challenges we will, sooner or later, face because of peak oil. Our future literally depends on it.
The opinions expressed here are the opinions of their respective authors, not necessarily of the Webmaster. Trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Permission has been secured to link to sites outside this site.
model sustainable city, model hydrogen city, model green city, model sustainable economy, model hydrogen economy, model green economy, sustainable cities, hydrogen cities, green cities, green city, model ammonia city, model ammonia economy, ammonia economy, ammonia city, green, environment, environmental, post-carbon, post-petroleum, post-oil, post-fossil fuels, green hydrogen economy, hydrogen economy, city planning, sustainability, renewable resources, passive energy, passive solar, solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, Macomb, Illinois, USA, Western Illinois, peak oil, oil depletion, resource scarcity